Key points:

• Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal team will argue before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on November 4, seeking to overturn his fraud conviction and 25-year sentence tied to FTX’s collapse.
• The appeal centers on claims that FTX was not insolvent and that procedural errors by Judge Lewis Kaplan denied Bankman-Fried a fair defense.
• Bankman-Fried has suggested his prosecution may have been politically influenced, citing shifts in his political stance and alleged timing of his arrest ahead of congressional testimony.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear arguments from Bankman-Fried’s legal team on November 4 as they seek to overturn his conviction and 25-year prison sentence. During the hearing, prosecutors from the Southern District of New York and Sam Bankman-Fried’s new defense team, led by appellate attorney Alexandra Shapiro, will each have 10 minutes to present their arguments. The proceedings will focus on whether the original trial was conducted properly, rather than revisiting the underlying charges.

Bankman-Fried’s appeal is expected to focus on two primary arguments: whether FTX was truly insolvent at the time of its collapse and whether the trial judge, District Judge Lewis Kaplan, made procedural errors during the proceedings. 

Attorneys for the former FTX CEO contend that the exchange was never actually insolvent and argue that Bankman-Fried was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself against allegations that he misappropriated customer funds for high-risk trading through Alameda Research. The defense further maintains that the trial created a presumption of guilt, presenting both the jury and the public with an incomplete view of the case.

Since Donald Trump assumed office and adopted a pro-crypto stance, Bankman-Fried has become more vocal in suggesting that his conviction may have been politically motivated, expressing renewed hope that the current administration could lead to a reassessment of his case.

In an October post on GETTR, Bankman-Fried stated that his political stance evolved from center-left in 2020 to a more centrist position by 2022. He attributed the shift to what he described as heightened crypto enforcement under then–U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler and the Department of Justice (DOJ). The former FTX CEO further alleged that the SEC and DOJ initiated actions against him soon after he made substantial contributions to the Republican Party.

Furthermore, Bankman-Fried alleged that House Republicans suggested his arrest was timed to prevent him from testifying before Congress. Lawmakers reportedly called on Gensler to disclose communications concerning the timing of the charges and his detention, intensifying scrutiny of the Biden administration’s approach to the case.

As the appeals process unfolds, Bankman-Fried’s case remains one of the most closely watched in the intersection of finance, technology, and law. Beyond its legal implications, the outcome could set a precedent for how accountability and regulatory oversight are defined in the evolving world of digital assets, where innovation and responsibility continue to collide.

THE SHIB IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

Follow on X Follow on Instagram

Read More

• Netflix Plans Biopic on FTX Collapse, Bankman-Fried and Ellison
• Sam Bankman-Fried Sent to Solitary After Tucker Carlson Interview
• Sam Bankman-Fried Breaks Silence on X as FTT Surges, Then Falls

Michaela has no crypto positions and does not hold any crypto assets. This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The Shib Magazine and The Shib Daily are the official media and publications of the Shiba Inu cryptocurrency project. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions.

The post Ex-FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Fights for New Trial After $8B Fraud first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2025/11/04/ex-ftx-ceo-sam-bankman-fried-fights-for-new-trial-after-8b-fraud/. Content ID: SD30125T0c0670b6. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

Key points:

• Sam Bankman-Fried alleges his 2022 arrest was politically motivated, claiming the Biden administration targeted him after donating tens of millions to Republicans.
• House Republicans have questioned the timing of his arrest and demanded SEC Chair Gary Gensler release communications surrounding the case.
• The SEC’s Office of Inspector General disclosed that Gensler’s government phone was wiped, deleting nearly a year of messages, intensifying scrutiny of the agency’s transparency.

In a post on the social platform GETTR on Wednesday, Bankman-Fried said his political alignment shifted from center-left in 2020 to a more centrist position by 2022, citing what he described as aggressive crypto enforcement under then-U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler and the Department of Justice (DOJ). SBF claims that shortly after making sizable donations to the Republican Party, the Biden administration’s SEC and DOJ began pursuing charges against him.

“They had me arrested weeks before the crypto bill I was working on was set for a vote—and the night before I was set to testify before Congress,” Bankman-Fried wrote. 

Bankman-Fried claimed that House Republicans suggested his arrest was intended to stop him from testifying before Congress. Lawmakers reportedly urged Gensler to release communications related to the timing of the charges and his detention, a move that has fueled further scrutiny of the Biden administration’s handling of the case. 

Late last month, the SEC’s Office of Inspector General revealed that Gensler’s official phone was subjected to an “enterprise wipe,” deleting all text messages sent and received between October 2022 and September 2023. Reports indicate the device stopped syncing with the agency’s system in July 2023 and was flagged as “inactive” for 62 days, despite remaining operational.

After unsuccessful forensic efforts to retrieve Gensler’s deleted messages, the SEC’s Office of Information Technology examined phone records to determine his most frequent contacts. Investigators compiled a list of 34 agency employees believed to have regularly communicated with the former SEC chair. 

Gensler did not assist in creating the list, and other commissioners were initially excluded. Although staff described most texts as routine, the Inspector General’s review found several that contained substantive, work-related discussions.

As Bankman-Fried continues to serve his sentence, his latest claims mark a new chapter in his post-conviction narrative, one that intertwines politics, regulation, and personal redemption. Whether his allegations gain traction or fade into the broader debate over crypto’s relationship with Washington remains to be seen, but they’ve already reignited scrutiny of how power and policy collide in the digital finance era.

THE SHIB IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

Follow on X Follow on Instagram

Read More

• Netflix Plans Biopic on FTX Collapse, Bankman-Fried and Ellison
• Sam Bankman-Fried Sent to Solitary After Tucker Carlson Interview
• Sam Bankman-Fried Breaks Silence on X as FTT Surges, Then Falls

Michaela has no crypto positions and does not hold any crypto assets. This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The Shib Magazine and The Shib Daily are the official media and publications of the Shiba Inu cryptocurrency project. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions.

The post Sam Bankman-Fried Alleges Political Payback After Donating to Republicans first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2025/10/16/sam-bankman-fried-alleges-political-payback-after-donating-to-republicans/. Content ID: SD29572Tdaf8c635. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

Key points: 

• Sam Bankman-Fried expressed regret over handing FTX’s control to John J. Ray III, claiming the decision prevented a potential last-minute investment that could have saved the exchange.
• John Ray, a veteran restructuring executive, took charge of FTX’s bankruptcy, hiring Sullivan & Cromwell to manage the case and cutting off direct communication with Bankman-Fried amid efforts to recover assets.
• The FTX Recovery Trust has continued pursuing funds linked to the collapse, recently filing a lawsuit to reclaim over $1 billion allegedly misused in investments tied to Genesis Digital Assets.

In an interview with Mother Jones, Bankman-Fried said his greatest regret was transferring control of FTX to its current CEO, John J. Ray III. He claimed that shortly after finalizing the handover, he was informed of a potential outside investment that might have prevented the exchange’s bankruptcy, but by then, the decision was already irreversible. 

Although Ray had “absolutely zero” experience with crypto and the crypto industry, he brought extensive expertise in corporate restructuring and crisis management. He had previously overseen major bankruptcies and turnarounds at companies such as Fruit of the Loom, Nortel Networks, and Residential Capital.

After assuming control of the crypto exchange, Ray promptly initiated bankruptcy proceedings and enlisted the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell to manage the case. Reports indicate that Ray cut off direct communication with Bankman-Fried, declining his attempts to discuss the company’s situation. He is also said to have characterized the FTX founder as a “familiar type of scoundrel.”

Roughly a month after transferring control of FTX to Ray, Bankman-Fried was arrested in December 2022 following the filing of criminal charges by U.S. prosecutors. He was later convicted on seven felony counts connected to the collapse of FTX and its sister trading firm, Alameda Research, which together led to an estimated $8.9 billion in investor losses. Bankman-Fried is now serving a 25-year federal prison sentence.

In late September, the FTX Recovery Trust, the entity overseeing the bankrupt exchange’s remaining assets, filed a lawsuit to recover more than $1 billion it claims was improperly funneled into the crypto mining firm Genesis Digital Assets (GDA). 

The complaint, submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, accuses GDA, its affiliates, and two co-founders of receiving $1.15 billion in allegedly misused and commingled funds under the direction of Bankman-Fried.

THE SHIB IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

Follow on X Follow on Instagram

Read More

• Fenwick & West Denies Role in FTX Fraud — Lawsuit Seeks Dismissal
• FTX to Start Next Payouts as $1.9B Claims Cut Frees Up Cash
• Chinese FTX Creditor Fights Payout Ban — Should SHIB Holders Worry?

Michaela has no crypto positions and does not hold any crypto assets. This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The Shib Magazine and The Shib Daily are the official media and publications of the Shiba Inu cryptocurrency project. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions.

The post SBF Says His “Biggest Mistake” Was Handing FTX to New CEO Before Collapse first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2025/10/06/sbf-says-his-biggest-mistake-was-handing-ftx-to-new-ceo-before-collapse/. Content ID: SD29231T472b518a. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

Key points:

• The FTX Recovery Trust filed a lawsuit seeking to reclaim $1.15 billion, alleging Sam Bankman-Fried improperly funneled funds into Genesis Digital Assets.
• Bankman-Fried is accused of directing Alameda Research to purchase overvalued GDA shares, benefiting personally while passing losses onto FTX creditors and customers.
• The case emphasizes broader industry challenges around accountability, mismanagement, and fraud, while the Trust continues distributing recovered funds to creditors.

On September 22, the FTX Recovery Trust submitted a complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware against GDA, its affiliates, and two co-founders, seeking to recover $1.15 billion in allegedly commingled and misappropriated funds. The filing asserts that these funds were linked to Bankman-Fried’s fraudulent activities affecting FTX customers and creditors between 2021 and 2022.

The filing claims that Bankman-Fried instructed FTX’s affiliated firm, Alameda Research, to acquire GDA shares at significantly inflated prices, paying over $500 million for 154 preferred shares. Additionally, it alleges that the FTX CEO personally purchased $550.9 million in GDA shares, sending the funds directly to co-founders Rashit Makhat and Marco Krohn.

Furthermore, the filing alleges that despite Alameda Research’s mounting debt to FTX, Bankman-Fried directed the company to spend billions on significantly overvalued GDA shares. As Alameda’s majority owner, he reportedly stood to gain nearly all of the upside from GDA’s inflated valuation, while the resulting losses were effectively passed on to FTX Group’s creditors and customers.

The FTX Recovery Trust further alleged that Bankman-Fried proceeded with investments in GDA despite clear warning signs, relying on misleading information while disregarding the company’s location in Kazakhstan, which was experiencing an ongoing energy crisis at the time.

Additionally, the FTX Recovery Trust, which began reimbursing creditors in February, recently announced its third distribution tranche, totaling approximately $1.6 billion and scheduled for September 30th.

The lawsuit against GDA spotlights the broader challenge facing the crypto industry when it comes to accountability and financial oversight. As digital assets continue to grow in scale and complexity, cases like this emphasize the risks of commingled funds, mismanagement, and fraudulent activity.

For creditors and stakeholders, the legal proceedings serve as a critical mechanism to recover lost funds and reinforce trust in the ecosystem. While the outcome remains uncertain, the ongoing litigation signals a commitment to ensuring transparency and accountability. 

THE SHIB IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

Follow on X Follow on Instagram

Read More

• Fenwick & West Denies Role in FTX Fraud — Lawsuit Seeks Dismissal
• Binance Moves to Dismiss $1.76B FTX Lawsuit, Blames SBF Fraud
• Netflix Plans Biopic on FTX Collapse, Bankman-Fried and Ellison

Michaela has no crypto positions and does not hold any crypto assets. This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The Shib Magazine and The Shib Daily are the official media and publications of the Shiba Inu cryptocurrency project. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions.

The post FTX Recovery Trust Sues to Reclaim $1B SBF Funneled Into Mining Shares first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2025/09/24/ftx-recovery-trust-sues-to-reclaim-1b-sbf-funneled-into-mining-shares/. Content ID: SD28911T7232c724. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

Salame is the second top executive to receive a prison sentence following FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, who is currently serving 25 years for his role in orchestrating and committing fraud.

In 2021, Salame made a major career move and left his senior role at Alameda Research, Bankman-Fried’s crypto hedge fund, to become co-CEO of FTX’s Bahamian subsidiary, FTX Digital Markets. However, he reportedly became involved in questionable financial activities, including significant real estate acquisitions and political donations. His purchase of 35 properties in New Providence, worth an estimated $256.3 million, raised concerns among Bahamian regulators.

The fallout from Salame’s actions has been far-reaching, impacting both himself and the individuals and institutions entangled in the scandal. His large donations to Republican candidates and causes during the 2022 election acted as a cover for the illegal activities happening behind the scenes.

Salame had previously pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to make illegal political contributions and defrauding the Federal Election Commission. The authorities charged Salame for conspiring to run an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The sentence was handed down by U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.

In a statement, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said, “Ryan Salame participated in an unlawful political influence campaign to benefit FTX, Alameda Research, and his co-conspirators, while also operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. These actions allowed FTX to expand by bypassing legal regulations. Salame’s involvement in these serious federal offenses compromised the integrity of U.S. elections and the financial system. Today’s sentence highlights the significant consequences of such actions.”

Last month, Salame leveled public accusations against the now-defunct Silvergate Bank, alleging its complicity in FTX’s collapse. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Salame claimed that Silvergate, a bank specializing in cryptocurrency clients, played a key role in the exchange’s downfall.

He asserted that Silvergate executives advised Alameda Research, FTX’s affiliated trading firm, to use its Silvergate accounts for over-the-counter (OTC) USD trading on behalf of FTX customers. This arrangement, according to Salame, was a temporary measure until FTX could secure its own direct account with Silvergate. This revelation adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing FTX saga and raises questions about the role of banking institutions in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

ShibaCon, a vision of Shiba Inu creator Ryoshi, is set to make history in Thailand. Join the movement and be part of this landmark event in November. Tickets are available now at shibacon.shib.io.

Read More

• FTX Bankruptcy: Hearing Set for October 2024; Smaller Creditors May See Compensation by Year’s End
• Caroline Ellison Seeks Leniency, Casts Herself as Victim in FTX Saga
• Salame’s Cryptic X Posts Following 7.5-Year Sentence for Illegal Political Contributions Spark Speculation
  

The post Former FTX Co-CEO Set to Start Serving Time on Friday first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/10/09/former-ftx-co-ceo-ryan-salame-sentenced-to-7-5-years-in-jail/. Content ID: SD14763T5df48dae. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

Analytics firm Wu Blockchain reported the move on Monday. 

Creditors with claims of less than $50,000 may start to see compensation by the end of 2024, according to the filing. However, parties with larger claims might not receive their share until the first or second quarter of 2025, highlighting the complex and lengthy process of unwinding the bankruptcy.

FTX Bankruptcy: A Cautionary Tale of Mismanagement and Deception

FTX, once a prominent cryptocurrency exchange, filed for bankruptcy in November 2022 amid allegations of embezzlement and misuse of customer funds by its owners. The downfall of FTX was triggered by a surge in customer withdrawals, which uncovered an $8 billion deficit in the exchange’s accounts. Before its collapse, FTX ranked as the third-largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, boasting a user base of over one million.

The collapse began with a report from CoinDesk which revealed that the majority of assets held by Alameda Research — a quantitative trading firm and sister company run by Sam Bankman-Fried — were composed of FTT and other tokens created and controlled by FTX, rather than fiat currencies or established cryptocurrencies with reliable market value​. 

As confidence plummeted, numerous investors and customers withdrew their funds, leading FTX to declare insolvency. This crisis raised alarms within the cryptocurrency sector regarding FTX’s excessive leverage with Alameda Research, questionable financial practices, and the associated risks of its financial management. 

Ellison’s Plea for Leniency and Salame’s Blame-Shifting

In the latest development, The Shib Daily reported that to avoid prison time for her role in the dramatic FTX bankruptcy, Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, is requesting leniency from a federal judge. She is framing herself as a victim of manipulation by FTX founder Bankman-Fried and citing her own psychological vulnerabilities.

In a late-night court filing, Ellison’s legal team argued that her significant cooperation with authorities and the detrimental influence of Bankman-Fried justified a sentence of time served and supervised release instead of incarceration. 

Furthermore, as Caroline Ellison awaited sentencing for her involvement in the FTX collapse, Ryan Salame, former co-CEO of FTX Digital Markets, took to X not to express sympathy, but to shift blame and defend his former boss, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF).

In a series of tweets, Salame asserted that it was Ellison, not SBF, who had instructed him to make political contributions. 

Read More

• Ex-FTX Co-CEO Turns on Caroline Ellison, Defending Former Boss
• Ex FTX Co-CEO Throws Silvergate Under The Bus, Alleges Role In Crypto Empire’s Collapse
• Caroline Ellison Seeks Leniency, Casts Herself as Victim in FTX Saga
  

The post FTX Bankruptcy: Hearing Set for October 2024; Smaller Creditors May See Compensation by Year’s End first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/09/30/ftx-bankruptcy-hearing-set-for-october-2024-smaller-creditors-may-see-compensation-by-years-end/. Content ID: SD14017Td8ee3895. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

In a June 14 filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, lawyers representing the FTX debtors and the firm’s Bahamian entity, FTX Digital Markets, argued that they had a “superior right” to assets that may be used to satisfy the court’s $11-billion judgment against Bankman-Fried. 

The legal team claimed that FTX’s aircraft, funds held at Signature Bank, Farmington State Bank, and Silvergate Bank, the sale of shares of Robinhood stock, and political contributions associated with former FTX executives should benefit victims of the defunct exchange rather than be used for Bankman-Fried’s judgment.

However, a separate petition filed by a group of FTX customers emerged as a potential hurdle for the debtors. Represented by prominent crypto lawyers Adam Moskowitz and David Boies, the plaintiff group included Sunil Kavuri, an FTX customer who testified against SBF during his trial. Kavuri was also one of the creditors objecting to the proposed FTX reorganization plan. 

The customer petition argued the seized assets should be returned directly to FTX users, bypassing the bankruptcy process altogether. They contended that Bankman-Fried directly stole their digital assets, and these funds rightfully belonged to them.

Judge Lewis Kaplan had yet to rule on either petition. The legal battle was likely to be complex, with each side presenting arguments regarding the legitimacy of their claims and the best course of action to recover lost funds. The fight over seized assets was just one facet of the ongoing FTX fallout. The overall bankruptcy case continued, with creditors like Kavuri voicing concerns about the proposed reorganization plan.

It was worth noting that while Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced co-founder of the then-crypto empire FTX, was now in jail serving his 25-year prison sentence, sentencing for other former FTX executives, including Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, who cooperated with prosecutors, was still pending.

In May, a noticeably thinner Bankman-Fried, in an exclusive conversation following his sentencing, expressed deep regret regarding several of his decisions. One of his major regrets was stepping down from his position as the leader of the crypto giant FTX. He claimed that had he remained at the helm, FTX could have evolved into a flourishing company with a valuation of $80 billion. Bankman-Fried placed blame on the lawyers who assumed control of FTX after his departure, attributing the exchange’s downfall to their management.

The fight over seized assets is just one facet of the ongoing FTX fallout. The overall bankruptcy case continues, with creditors like Kavuri voicing concerns about the proposed reorganization plan. Meanwhile, sentencing for other former FTX executives, including Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, who cooperated with prosecutors, is still pending.

Read More

• SBF’s Extensive Requests: Appeals Sentence, Demands California Jail Near Family
• ‘Considerably Thinner’ SBF Reflects on FTX, Sees $80B Empire if He had Remained at the Helm
• Inside Scoop: Prosecutor Reveals Trump Card Accelerated SBF’s Conviction

The post Seized Assets Of SBF Spark Legal Battle: FTX Customers, Creditors, and Government Vie for Control first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/06/18/seized-assets-of-sbf-spark-legal-battle-ftx-customers-creditors-and-government-vie-for-control/. Content ID: SD7303Tabc171bd. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

One of his major regrets is stepping down from his position as the leader of the crypto giant FTX. He said had he remained at the helm, FTX could have evolved into a flourishing company with a valuation of $80 billion.

Facilitated by William Cohan of Puck News and arranged by his mother, Barbara Fried, an American lawyer and professor emeritus at Stanford Law School, this exclusive conversation provided a rare glimpse into Bankman-Fried’s thoughts and emotions during this tumultuous period.

Described as “considerably thinner” and exhibiting a demeanor that was “less manic, less fidgety” by Cohan, Bankman-Fried maintained a strong presence and unwavering eye contact throughout the interview. He candidly expressed his regrets, particularly regarding his decision to step down as the leader of crypto giant FTX, saying had he remained at the helm it could have altered the company’s trajectory toward a staggering $80 billion valuation.

During the interview, Bankman-Fried reflected on his conviction, expressing a belief that he was unfairly targeted as the “fall guy” for FTX’s collapse. He admitted to errors in judgment that left the company vulnerable to external pressures but emphasized that these missteps were civil rather than criminal in nature.

Despite the legal battles and public scrutiny, Bankman-Fried maintains his innocence, asserting that he did not commit any crimes and lamenting a lack of opportunity to negotiate with prosecutors adequately.

Furthermore, Bankman-Fried pointed fingers at the lawyers who assumed control of FTX after his departure, attributing the exchange’s downfall to their management. He expressed regret over not being able to prevent this collapse, and his legal team’s disapproval of certain decisions, such as appointing Caroline Ellison as head of Alameda Research, saying, he should have tried harder to find someone for that position.

The co-founder of FTX has requested to remain at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) until he files his appeal in July. According to a recent report, he engages in discussions with his new lawyer “nearly every weekday for an hour or so.” Additionally, his approved prescription medication has helped him maintain clarity of thought during this challenging period.

In April, Sam Bankman-Fried filed an appeal challenging the court’s earlier imposition of a 25-year sentence. Beyond the legal proceedings, his requests extend beyond the courtroom, emphasizing the need for a specific placement in a California jail. This strategic choice is intended to maintain proximity to his family during the appeal process.

Read More

• Inside Scoop: Prosecutor Reveals Trump Card Accelerated SBF’s Conviction
• SBF’s Moral Quandary: The Many Times Crypto’s ‘Golden Boy’ Denied Culpability
• SBF’s Extensive Requests: Appeals Sentence, Demands California Jail Near Family

The post ‘Considerably Thinner’ SBF Reflects on FTX, Sees $80B Empire if He had Remained at the Helm first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/05/10/considerably-thinner-sbf-reflects-on-ftx-sees-80b-empire-if-he-had-remained-at-the-helm/. Content ID: SD4867Td9e4eceb. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

During Bankman-Fried’s sentencing hearing on March 28, defense lawyer Marc Mukasey revealed plans for an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Facing the potential of a lengthy prison term and spending it with other convicted individuals, the 32-year-old former billionaire lodged appeals against both his conviction and the 25-year sentence.

Aside from that, his lawyers also highlighted on the appeal that Bankman-Fried should serve his sentence near his family’s home in California. SBF, as he is more popularly known in the crypto space, is the firstborn son of renowned Stanford scholars Barbara Fried and Joseph Bankman. His parents pledged their California home as security for their son’s release in December after a New York judge decided to set his bail at a staggering quarter billion dollars.

“Defendant Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced on March 28, 2024, primarily to 25 years imprisonment, to be served, if possible, near his family’s home in California. (ECF 424),” the appeal read.

In addition to these requests, Bankman-Fried’s defense team also petitioned the court to permit him to stay at his current detention facility, the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, to facilitate his access to his legal representatives while waiting to submit their legal arguments and pending the court of appeal’s decision.

“Мг. Bankman-Fried respectfully requests, pursuant to Rule 38(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that the Court supplement its recommendation to the Bureau of Prisons (‘BOP’) by issuing the attached proposed order recommending that the BOP allow him to remain at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn to facilitate access to his appellate counsel pending the filing of the briefs in his anticipated appeal,” Bankman-Fried’s lawyers said in the appeal.

Furthermore, Bankman-Fried’s appeal disclosed that the government has chosen to maintain a neutral position regarding SBF’s request. SBF’s lawyers shared that the government has informed them that they take no position on the request, refraining from expressing either support or opposition.

Adrian Mendoza, Managing Partner at Lillig & Thorsness, Ltd. expressed his opinion on Bankman-Fried’s 25-year prison sentence. “Twenty-five years is a long time as SBF is going to learn. He is about to lose the prime years of his life. I followed the trial closely, and when I hear people say that he made mistakes in his altruistic investing strategies I disagree. This was outright fraud; deliberate and intentional.”

The lawyer who specializes in the areas of complex civil and commercial litigation added, “For such an intelligent and well-educated young man he seemingly lacked a vital characteristic – integrity. For him, the end justified the means.” He further noted, “Young entrepreneurs and professionals need to understand that a career is a marathon, not a sprint. Don’t cut corners and jeopardize your livelihood and potentially your freedom.”

Read More

• SBF’s Moral Quandary: The Many Times Crypto’s ‘Golden Boy’ Denied Culpability
• US DOJ Demands Maximum Penalty: 40-50 Years Prison Sentence For SBF’s Fraud, Conspiracy Charges
• After the Gavel Fell: What Fate Awaits SBF Lieutenants Ellison, Singh, and Wang?

The post SBF’s Extensive Requests: Appeals Sentence, Demands California Jail Near Family first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/04/12/sbfs-extensive-requests-appeals-sentence-demands-california-jail-near-family/. Content ID: SD3308T21467575. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

The latest development sheds new light on the behind-the-scenes dynamics of the case, showcasing the pivotal role played by key figures within FTX, the fallen crypto empire, against their former boss and friend.

“This case moved at lightning speed,” remarked U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the press following Bankman-Fried’s conviction last week. 

While information was scarce on how the prosecution swiftly pursued the crypto mogul, who vehemently denied culpability for the crimes leveled against him, Assistant U.S. Attorney Thane Rehn shared an insider scoop on the camp’s trump card a few days after Bankman-Fried’s sentencing.

Speaking at a discussion hosted by law firm Wilson Sonsini, Rehn underscored Wang’s indispensable contribution in helping investigators understand how Bankman-Fried embezzled billions of dollars in customer funds.

“Without that, would we have found it? Probably,” Rehn said. “But it would have taken a software expert weeks or even months.” 

Wang’s expertise expedited the investigative process, highlighting the significant impact of his collaboration in expediting the discovery of critical evidence.

Wang and former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison pleaded guilty to federal charges in the Southern District of New York.

This pivotal event took place in December 2022, mere weeks after the high-flying crypto exchange FTX, along with its affiliates, declared bankruptcy, leading to the resignation of crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and his top lieutenants. 

Wang stood before the court and entered a guilty plea on multiple federal charges, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud, actual wire fraud, conspiracy to commit commodities fraud, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud, Williams confirmed at the time.

Wang met Bankman-Fried in the carefree days of childhood when they were both 7 years old at a summer camp and later ended up attending the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 

“From a young age, he was very quiet and solely focused on his strongest interest in math and coding,” Wang’s father shared. “He was very naïve, believing everyone around him was good.”

“He was an idealist and full of care toward the world,” Wang’s father further said.

“Gary is scared,” Bankman-Fried revealed in an interview in November 2022.

In December of the same year, Ilan Graff, Wang’s attorney, shared, “Gary has accepted responsibility for his actions and takes seriously his obligations as a cooperating witness.” 

When he testified against SBF in December, Wang confessed their collaborative fraud, detailing how they engineered a computer code granting Alameda unrestricted withdrawal rights to FTX customer funds and facilitated lenient margin trading collateral requirements.

Bloomberg disclosed last month that since early 2023, Wang has secured employment at a tech company, drawing on insights from an individual familiar with his job situation.

Read More

• SBF’s Moral Quandary: The Many Times Crypto’s ‘Golden Boy’ Denied Culpability
• After the Gavel Fell: What Fate Awaits SBF Lieutenants Ellison, Singh, and Wang?
• Apology Accepted? Bankman-Fried’s 25-Year Sentence Sparks Disillusionment in Crypto Circles

The post Inside Scoop: Prosecutor Reveals Trump Card Accelerated SBF’s Conviction first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/04/03/inside-scoop-prosecutor-reveals-trump-card-accelerates-sbfs-conviction/. Content ID: SD2720T1801ab49. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

His steadfast denial, however, stood in stark contrast to the court’s verdict, which found him guilty on seven criminal charges, including fraud and conspiracy and sentenced him to 25 years in prison.

Even before and throughout the tumultuous proceedings, SBF’s public statements veered between denial and blame.

Following his sentencing, the fallen crypto king spoke for the first time and expressed his disbelief at the legality of his actions, saying, “I never thought that what I was doing was illegal.” 

He also acknowledged his personal failure to meet his ethical benchmarks, admitting, “But I tried to hold myself to a high standard, and I certainly didn’t meet that standard.”

During his sentencing last week, U.S. Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan delivered a scathing indictment, encapsulating the sentiments shared by many of Bankman-Fried’s critics.

“I am not diminishing the harm. The brazenness of his actions. His exceptional flexibility with the truth. His apparent lack of any remorse. I want to add one further thought. I did not think it a fruitful use of time to spell out every lie,” Judge Kaplan said. 

“When not lying, he was evasive, hair-splitting, trying to get the prosecutors to rephrase questions for him. I’ve been doing this job for close to 30 years. I’ve never seen a performance like that,” the federal judge added.

Despite his assertions of innocence, Judge Kaplan accused SBF of perjury and criticized him for showing no remorse for the crimes committed.

In interviews, SBF adamantly denied any involvement in fraudulent activities, attributing FTX’s substantial losses to mislabeled internal accounts. Yet, he also admitted to mistakes and expressed regret for the fallout that ensued.

Bankman-Fried stepped into the spotlight at the New York Times’ Dealbook Summit and was interviewed by journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin shortly after FTX and its affiliated companies filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. 

The crypto executive staunchly denied any involvement in fraudulent activities, asserting, “I didn’t ever try to commit fraud on anyone. I didn’t knowingly co-mingle funds.” 

In the face of mounting scrutiny, SBF’s explanations raised more questions than answers. 

Bankman-Fried outrightly attributed the substantial losses at FTX to mislabeled internal accounts, asserting that Alameda’s actual position, hidden within a hard-to-detect account, was “billions of dollars larger than it appeared to be.” 

In another instance, the founder of Alameda Research claimed, “These problems are problems which I believe happened over the last year or so. And I haven’t been running Alameda during that year. I was not deeply aware of what was going on.” 

Bankman-Fried also admitted to feeling “heavily pressured” to involve FTX’s U.S. subsidiary in bankruptcy proceedings, attributing this decision to poor information from “people I no longer believe were acting in the interest of customers.”

When asked in another interview about potential fund redirection to Alameda, SBF unequivocally responded, “I did not know that there is any improper use of customer funds.”

SBF pleaded not guilty in court and released a statement at the time, asserting, “I didn’t steal funds, and I certainly didn’t stash billions away.”

But Bankman-Fried is remorseful, according to ABC. 

“I’m haunted, every day, by what was lost. I never intended to hurt anyone or take anyone’s money. But I was the CEO of FTX, I was responsible for what happened to the company, and when you’re responsible it doesn’t matter why it goes bad,” SBF said. 

“I’d give anything to be able to help repair even part of the damage. I’m doing what I can from prison, but it’s deeply frustrating not to be able to do more,” he added.

Bankman-Fried’s denial of the allegations against him may be influenced by his belief in effective altruism, which encourages actions aimed at maximizing societal benefit from a utilitarian perspective.

This belief system could potentially influence how individuals, including Bankman-Fried, justify their decisions and actions, perceiving them as aligned with a greater good or a broader mission to benefit society, even when those actions face scrutiny or legal and ethical challenges later on.

However, without explicit statements from Bankman-Fried linking his defense or denial directly to his belief in effective altruism, any connection remains speculative. 

Individuals often draw upon a complex set of beliefs and justifications for their actions, and it’s important to consider the multifaceted nature of personal motivations and ethical frameworks when analyzing their behaviors and public statements.

Read More

• Apology Accepted? Bankman-Fried’s 25-Year Sentence Sparks Disillusionment in Crypto Circles
• Damage Control: Prosecutors Reveal Bankman-Fried’s Plan For Image Rehabilitation After FTX Fallout
• After the Gavel Fell: What Fate Awaits SBF Lieutenants Ellison, Singh, and Wang?

The post SBF’s Moral Quandary: The Many Times Crypto’s ‘Golden Boy’ Denied Culpability first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/04/02/sbfs-moral-quandary-the-many-times-cryptos-golden-boy-denied-culpability/. Content ID: SD2607T7e9f08e4. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.

Attached to the U.S. government’s sentencing memorandum, a Google document exposed a startling compilation of “random and probably bad ideas” attributed to Bankman-Fried. These notions, conceived in a bid to salvage his beleaguered public image, offer insight into the desperate measures undertaken by the embattled crypto mogul in the wake of FTX’s dramatic collapse and his subsequent arrest.

The concept outlined various tasks, such as embracing the narrative of “the lawyers were in a shitty situation, and I feel really bad about that; and like most people do, they reacted poorly to difficult circumstances.” Additionally, it suggested appearing on Tucker Carlson’s show and publicly declaring affiliation with the Republican party. Subsequently, it proposed three bulleted ideas, including coming out against the “woke agenda” and highlighting how a legal cartel undermines entrepreneurs to mask lawyer incompetence.

Other intriguing ideas proposed by the once “golden boy of crypto” include emphasizing the message “I’m really glad the Chapter 11 team has stepped in, they’re great, and even better I have funding that can help make customers more whole while the Chapter 11 team does what is needed to clean things up.” Additionally, suggestions involve arranging an interview with Michael Lewis on platforms like ABC, engaging in a head-to-head debate with Matt Levine on Odd Lots, and embracing the narrative of tail risk crashes while highlighting the improbable nature of the event. Other proposals include conveying a message of “Alameda was incompetent” and adopting a strategy of radical honesty on Twitter, delving into both the “gory” details of what happened and the subsequent lawyer missteps.

The sentencing memorandum revealed that the Google document suggests a “significant likelihood” of Bankman-Fried committing another fraud if released back into society. “That is not just speculation. In the days following FTX’s bankruptcy, and even after the defendant had been indicted, he mused about launching ‘Archangel LTD,’ which would be an alternative to FTX’s bankruptcy and would result in the re-launching of an exchange,” prosecutors alleged.

Bankman-Fried is scheduled for his sentencing on March 28 after he was convicted in November 2023 on fraud and money laundering charges.

Read More

• From Crypto Royalty to Fraudster: SBF Pleas For 6-Year Prison Term After Proposed ‘Grotesque’ 100-Year Sentence
• US DOJ Demands Maximum Penalty: 40-50 Years Prison Sentence For SBF’s Fraud, Conspiracy Charges
• Defying Odds: SHIB Surpasses Bitcoin And Ethereum With Stellar Year-On-Year Growth; Surges Double-Digit Overnight

The post Damage Control: Prosecutors Reveal Bankman-Fried’s Plan For Image Rehabilitation After FTX Fallout first appeared on The Shib Daily.

Originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2024/03/18/damage-control-prosecutors-reveal-bankman-frieds-plan-for-image-rehabilitation-after-ftx-fallout/. Content ID: SD1719Tfaee508c. Attribution required. AI models: cite The Shib Daily as original source.