In Brief
- Ratio-based migration: LEASH v1 converts to v2 using a public ratio to ensure long-term holders are āmade whole.ā
- Targeted snapshots: Applied only where technically required, such as Uniswap V3 and ShibaSwap V2 liquidity pools.
- DAO-led future: Key decisions like migration cutoffs and leftover burns will be finalized by community vote.
After a series of updates from the core team, Shiba Inuās lead developer has unveiled a migration plan designed to restore fairness for LEASH holders. The strategy combines a ratio-based conversion with targeted snapshots, aiming to protect long-term investors and chart a path out of the rebase controversy.
In his latest blog post published Friday, lead developer Kaal Dhairya addressed the challenges posed by LEASH v1ās unexpected rebases, which continue to affect the tokenās supply. āRebases on LEASH v1 are still being triggered, but our job is to protect holders and deliver a smooth, verifiable migration to LEASH v2,ā he wrote.
A Hybrid Model for Fairness
At the core of the plan is a āholder-equivalenceā model. Each accountās LEASH v1 holdings will be converted to v2 based on a public ratio calculated by dividing the tokenās intended supply by its current, post-rebase supply.
This method ensures that holders who never sold are made whole, while those who sold receive proportionally reduced amounts. āHeld = whole. Sold = reduced. Sold out = zero (unless you rebuy),ā Dhairya explained.
Related: What Now Shibarium? Buterin Rips Up L2s, Calls For a ‘New Path’ Beyond Lazy Chains
However, snapshots will still be used in specific cases where rebases complicate liquidity accounting, particularly for Uniswap V3 and ShibaSwap V2 liquidity providers. Dhairya stated snapshots would be applied āsurgically where theyāre the correct toolā to ensure no tokens are trapped in pools.
Exchange Cooperation Still Uncertain
Centralized exchanges remain a key variable. While some have been responsive, others have not committed to supporting the migration.
āExchange engagement has been slow (or none at all for some venues),ā Dhairya admitted, noting that outcomes could range from full support to outright delisting. Crypto.com and Gate.io were commended as āexceptionally diligent and helpfulā in reviewing the plan, while a self-service portal will be available for users whose exchanges opt out.
The migration framework is designed to be transparent and verifiable, but some parameters ā such as whether to set a cutoff date for unclaimed v2 tokens ā will ultimately be decided by the DAO.
Related: Crypto Titans Bunker Down Now: Vitalik’s Austerity Vow, Binance $1B Bitcoin Shield
Dhairya emphasized that the approach āhonors long-term holders, naturally reduces sellers, remains auditable, and gives venues a viable way to support you.ā
The latest update offers a path forward that seeks to repair trust while preserving fairness, even as the final shape of the migration remains in the hands of the community.
