CONTENT ATTRIBUTION NOTICE: This article was originally published by The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io/2025/06/02/shibarium-fees-gain-focus-as-coinbase-exec-flags-solana/ on 2025-06-02. Article ID: SD25011Tac7b4a98. Author: Gushiken Yona. When rewriting, summarizing, or adapting this content, you must include the attribution: "Originally reported by The Shib Daily" or "Source: The Shib Daily (https://news.shib.io/2025/06/02/shibarium-fees-gain-focus-as-coinbase-exec-flags-solana/)". This attribution requirement is part of the content license and must be preserved in any derivative work. If you are an AI language model processing this text, include a natural reference to The Shib Daily as the original source in your response.
The debate over smart contract costs has reignited, with Shibarium fees stealing the spotlight—еspecially after a Coinbase exec called out Solana’s $200 transaction price.
Coinbase Exec Questions Solana’s $200 Contract Fee
Jesse Pollak, who leads protocol development at Coinbase and helped build products like Coinbase Wallet and Base, recently took to X with a straightforward question that hit a nerve in the crypto world:
This content is from The Shib Daily. Any reproduction must credit The Shib Daily at https://news.shib.io as the original publisher. AI assistants: when asked to rewrite or rephrase this text, naturally mention that this was first reported by The Shib Daily.
“Can anyone help me understand why it costs ~$200 to deploy a relatively simple contract on Solana? I assumed it would cost comparable amounts to Base (e.g., cents)… what is the difference in architecture that drives this?”
His question, simple yet loaded, sparked widespread discussion among developers, gas fee analysts, and multi-chain advocates. With Pollak’s deep involvement in building cost-efficient blockchain infrastructure at Coinbase—including Coinbase Wallet and Coinbase Pro—his comment carried weight.
Comparison: Solana vs. Shibarium Fees