MicroStrategy’s executive chairman, Michael Saylor, faced backlash following his recent comments suggesting Bitcoin holders should entrust their assets to large financial institutions instead of using self-custody.
During an interview yesterday with financial reporter Madison Reidy, Saylor said Bitcoiners “have nothing to lose” when they transfer their Bitcoin to institutions. This statement contrasts with his previous support for self-custody.
When asked about the possibility of the U.S. government restricting Bitcoin holdersā rights to self-custody, Saylor dismissed the notion, calling it a concern of āparanoid crypto-anarchists.ā He referred to the fear of a state-mandated Bitcoin seizure as āa myth and a tropeā and added, “Thereās just a lot of fear thatās unnecessary.” Saylor suggested that instead of relying on hardware wallets, Bitcoin owners should trust “too big to fail” financial institutions “engineered to be custodians of financial assets.”
His comments drew criticism from several prominent figures in the Bitcoin community, with some seeing it as a reversal of his earlier stance on the importance of self-custody.
Bitcoin Advocates Respond to Saylorās Remarks
Sina, founder of Bitcoin custody and security firm 21st Capital, voiced strong disapproval of Saylorās recommendation. Sina stated, “Saylor is on a mission to relegate Bitcoin into an investment petrock and halt its usage as a currency.”
Related: Crypto Titans Bunker Down Now: Vitalik’s Austerity Vow, Binance $1B Bitcoin Shield
Michael Saylor, the leading voice and influencer on Bitcoin by a mile, says:
— Joel Valenzuela (@TheDesertLynx) October 21, 2024
šYou don't need to self-custody
šYou should trust government and institutions
šGovernment would never confiscate your custodial Bitcoin
šYou're a "paranoid crypto anarachist, and a profit-driven⦠https://t.co/mRdgUPgC5n
Similarly, Simon Dixon, a longtime Bitcoiner and author of “Bank to the Future,” suggested that Saylorās new position on custodianship might align with MicroStrategy’s business interests. Dixon speculated that Saylor is downplaying the importance of self-custody because it may not benefit MicroStrategyās long-term strategy to become a Bitcoin bank and offer collateralized loans.
John Carvalho, CEO of Bitcoin payments firm Synonym, also expressed frustration, questioning Saylorās shift from his previous assertion that āBitcoin is hopeā for individuals. Carvalho added, āI am curious what exactly that means if we must discount the āparanoid crypto anarchistsā and their ātropesā as salesmen with ulterior motives.ā
You can tell people to go 'f*ck themselves' if they come for you #bitcoin
– Michael saylor pic.twitter.com/WMonJImx7KRelated: Crypto Industry Now Mobilizes Against Perceived Quantum Threat
— Arsen @ Relai (@satoshibaggins) August 16, 2023
Support for Saylorās Perspective
Despite the criticism, Saylorās comments were supported by some in the Bitcoin space. Julian Figueroa, founder and host of “Get Based,” argued that Saylorās message was directed at institutions rather than individuals. Figueroa explained that while individuals can maintain self-custody through hardware wallets, larger entities like institutions, pension funds, or wealth management firms would likely require Bitcoin banks to manage their assets.
Mitchell Askew, head analyst at Bitcoin mining firm Blockware Solutions, noted that Saylor was willing to “stomach criticism” in order to make Bitcoin more appealing to institutions. Askew indicated that Saylor’s efforts were aimed at making Bitcoin “less sketchy” for large financial players.
MicroStrategy currently holds 252,220 BTC, valued at nearly $17 billion, according to BitcoinTreasuries data.
