Lawrence Damilola
Sam Altman’s “proof-of-humanity” initiative, formerly known as Worldcoin, has launched a new Ethereum layer-2 blockchain called World Chain.
In a statement released on October 17, the company announced that the 15 million users who have authenticated their identity through iris scans for a “World ID” can now access this new network.
World Chain aims to enhance efficiency and add new features for users of the Worldcoin token, as the company seeks to scale its onboarding process. The network is designed to prioritize verified users — those with World IDs — over bots by providing them with block space and free gas allowances.
In addition, World Chain will host several prominent applications and platforms, including Optimism for interoperability, Uniswap for asset trading, Zerion for real-time APIs, and Alchemy for development support.
Concerns Over Biometric Data Risks in Centralized World Chain System
The launch of World Chain has introduced important questions regarding the potential risks associated with its biometric data collection and centralized governance. While the project is designed to authenticate users by scanning their irises to create a “World ID,” experts have voiced serious concerns about the future implications of such a system.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is among the prominent figures raising alarm. He pointed out that although Worldcoin claims to prioritize privacy, the technology presents risks tied to centralization and data security.
Buterin asked what could prevent the system from being altered to introduce fake identities or misused for surveillance if changes were made to the Worldcoin protocol. He noted the potential for backdoors in the system’s proprietary algorithms, which could allow unchecked control by its operators. This raises fears that a simple change in the code could lead to significant misuse, affecting millions of users worldwide
The privacy risks of centralized biometric data storage have been echoed by other experts. Hudson Jameson, an Ethereum developer, described the use of biometric data by Worldcoin as “scary” and “creepy,” suggesting that such personal data could be exploited for tracking or surveillance. Moreover, the collection of biometric data, even if hashed, could still lead to security breaches or unauthorized uses, adding another layer of concern.
Other critics argue that the centralized nature of Worldcoin’s system exposes it to serious privacy vulnerabilities. For instance, regulators in multiple countries, including Kenya and Spain, have already taken action against the project, citing concerns over potential misuse and inadequate data protection measures. The scale of such a biometric database could make it a tempting target for malicious actors, amplifying the risks tied to its centralized control.
These concerns about Worldcoin underscore a fundamental issue: while the project aims to distinguish humans from bots, it raises important questions about how such a powerful system could be controlled — and what happens if it falls into the wrong hands.
Read More
- Worldcoin Defiant: Services Paused, Legal Challenge Against Spanish Ban Launched
- Singapore Probes Shadow Market for Worldcoin Accounts
- Worldcoin Hits Roadblock in Portugal: Forced to Pause Personal Data Collection for 90 Days
Lawrence does not hold any crypto asset. This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The Shib Magazine and The Shib Daily are the official media and publications of the Shiba Inu cryptocurrency project. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decisions.
